That Kelley, he’s so excited

If you use Chrome browser, have I got a thing for you. If you don’t use Chrome, do yourself a favor and install it even temporarily for the pure pleasure of Jailbreak the Patriarchy, a fabulous extension by Danielle Sucher.

Go, go, go. Go read the examples and see if/when your head turns inside out. Then install Jailbreak and go play. The Internet is full of words and those words are full of gender assumptions, precious, yes they are. Go see for yourself.

Danielle Sucher, my brother, if you are ever in Seattle, I would love to provide you the beverage of your choice.

Enjoy your genderfuck day.

The listening face

Today’s tea-snorting moment is brought to you by cheese people.

I am fascinated by this kind of funny because (it seems to me) it’s based on the particular tension of having internalized something that I know isn’t actually true (Boys Can’t Listen! And Girls Only Talk About The Tedious Minutiae Of Other People! But Boys Have To Convince Girls They Are Listening In Order To Get Sex!). Do I think men are biologically incapable of genuinely paying attention to what’s important to someone else? Well, of course not. But is this advert funny because it’s so true? Well, kinda. So what’s that about?

Gender, gender, socialization and gender. And context, too, because thirty years ago, there would have been a subtle but inescapably hostile vibe to this ad. On some level, it would have been making fun of women, a nudge-nudge-wink-wink pretend you’re sensitive and get laid moment between the guys. But today it feels to me like a comment on culture that I can share with someone who is male-gendered (assuming they have a sense of humor) where we can both laugh from our place on the spectrum. Is that because I’ve changed, or the culture has? Is it remotely possible (please tell me it is) that we are living in times when we can see our behavior around gender roles and understand the essential wackarooni of it, even if it still works on us in the everyday moments?

Oh dear, maybe I’ve just been drinking the cheesy Kool Aid. Ah well. Time for more tea.

Enjoy your day.
 

 

Gender 101

Thanks to Cheryl Morgan for this cogent post on Gender 101. Read it, share it.

And with that I love you and leave you, as the English say: today is a Day of Many Errands, and so here I go, run run run on the outside but peaceful on the inside, into the mist that looks determined to hang on as long as it can. Into September. I will be thinking about life and love and story and work, about choices, about the funny squeaking sound the car is making right now, about eggs over easy, about the sass of Seattle crows, and every time I hear someone laugh, I will be happy.

Enjoy your day.

If I were a better boy

I was one of those late bloomers (it’s a joke in our house that I still seem to learn some things about being a grownup later than everyone else…). In my 6th and 7th grade years, the girls I knew were divided between dealing with the embarrassment of having breasts and bleeding, and dealing with embarrassment of not having them. Of being left behind. And I had short enough hair when I was that age that I was still getting called “son” by the occasional inattentive or distracted stranger. It did nothing for my self image, and I’m sure it’s one of the reasons I began to grow my hair as a teenager: to prove that I could, even if I couldn’t seem to do any of the rest of it “right.”

I never wanted to be a boy. But when I look back on my childhood, I realize how lucky I was to have been given many of a boy’s freedom’s: it was the South in the late 60’s/early 70’s, and most of my girlfriends were pretty overtly gendered by their parents. Of course it rubbed off on me — peer influence is one of the strongest forces in the human animal, both the doing and the being done to. At my friends’ houses I sat mystified on the sidelines of discussions about training bras (I swear, I am not making this up. Do they still do that?) and shaving and eyebrow shaping… but at home I was allowed to be non-girly, smart, to read whatever I wanted, to ride my bicycle as far as my legs would take me (although I gave my dad a bad moment one day when he was driving on one of Tampa’s busiest 6-lane arterials and saw me madly pumping along on the sidewalk, on the wrong side of the street from home).

I never wanted to be a boy: but since I had the chance to act like one for a while, I wish now I’d been better at it. I wish I had learned boy skills, not just boy autonomy. I wish I had learned to give a punch in the stomach as well as take one (my welcome to the neighborhood present from a gang of boys when I was 6). I wish I’d learned to treat getting hurt like getting a bad lunch — an oh, well kind of thing — but instead I was so physically timid that I wouldn’t even learn to swing by my knees from the trapeze, as much as I longed to. I wish that I’d learned to get right up in other people’s faces and get mad, tell them to knock it off, instead of just keeping quiet or resorting to interminable hedging as a way to protect myself. From what? From bad words or bad thoughts or maybe the occasional shove on the playground? What would have been so bad about that? I wish I knew then that those things are easier to learn at age 8 than 48.

Nicola and I have both written about how much we love and appreciate our neighbors. All of them except one set of folks on the street behind us, who made our first two years here occasional hell with their fucking noise. They seemed to have no conception at all that sound carries, and that playing their radio outside at volume 11 might actually not be other people’s idea of great entertainment. They started having outdoor parties every weekend. They started inviting people over who got drunk in the backyard, yelled and screamed, called each other motherfucker and bitch, until 2 in the morning. And all of it carried into our house as if they’d hung speakers in our living room. It was a nightmare.

I absolutely hate confronting people about this kind of thing. I do it, but Christ, I hate it. I’m not the least confident person in the world, but this twists me up something fierce. So I would get up and go over there in the middle of the night and ask them to dial it down, and they would for 20 minutes, and then it would start to creep up. I called the police, but they often had better things to do on a Saturday night (which I totally understand and support). And I started to get so stressed about it that it literally made me sick.

Why couldn’t I just be a boy for ten minutes? Walk over there, say Shut the fuck up or I’m calling the cops, come home. Why did I need them to actually understand that they were having a hideous impact? Why did I need them to want to behave better? If I were a boy, it would be enough to actually make them behave better, whether they wanted to or not.

I did do this once, in our previous neighborhood. The Young People who were renting 6-to-the-house across the street thought they were still living on campus, so they had loud screaming punk rock parties out in the front yard every weekend. We complained, they didn’t really care, it went on. One night I just snapped. It was pouring rain, and I threw on the minimum of clothes and stalked over there in my bare feet, righteously pissed. The Young People were crowded onto the porch: they took one look at me and fled inside. That was a rush, I gotta tell you — they ran away from me! That’s what it’s like to be a boy, you can actually scare people away!

One Young Man stayed sitting on his porch because he was too drunk to stand up. He made the mistake of arguing with me that he had the right to have a party in his own house. And I just… went. I yelled, I swore, I threatened him with the police, and I ordered him back into the house. And he went.

And I went home in the rain so shaky that I had to take drugs to sleep. Not scared, exactly, but profoundly unsettled. And that wasn’t a nice feeling, at all.

The next day he came by to apologize. By then, another of my neighbors had organized a letter from the five houses around the Young People to complain to them and their landlord. I told him to expect the letter; and he was genuinely surprised to hear that people around there didn’t like him a lot. Jesus.

The neighbor thing here worked out, pretty much. We had bonded so well with our wonderful neighbors in our own cul-de-sac that when I remembered the previous letter experience and asked them to sign a letter with me, they agreed. They supported me when I emailed the police. And the police turn out to have a Neighborhood Team, with wonderful officers who take disturbing the peace very seriously.

One of those wonderful officers called me when my email was forwarded to him. “Kelley,” he said, “I’m going to take care of this for you.” And he did, that same day. And I was grateful because someone else was making the Noisy People be quiet; a thing I couldn’t seem to do myself.

All has been well until this weekend, when we were greeted on Saturday morning by a blast of music so loud that I thought my ears would bleed. I went over to my neighbors across the street (we’re now talking hundreds of feet from the Noisy People), and the radio was as clear as a bell there too. Really loud.

So I sucked it up and came home and called the Noisy People to complain, since I had their phone number as a result of the whole police intervention thing. I had to leave a message because, I assume, no one could actually hear the phone ring.

About a half hour later, one of my cul-de-sac neighbors stopped by to let me know that he had heard the music, got pissed, went over there, told them to turn it down or he’d call the police, and walked away.

They turned it down.

Why couldn’t I have done that with the obvious lack of stress that he did? And if I had done it, would it have worked? I don’t know. The Noisy Person called later and we had an awkward conversation, but at least we talked. That was important to me, sure, but is it actually better? Will it make a difference? I don’t know.

But sometimes I wish I were a better boy.

Just say no to gender stability

Hi Kelley,

I finally got our library to get Solitaire, and I read it in two days. What an amazing work! Thank you for writing it… my thoughts will be crunching away at some important ideas for a long while.

I went back to re-read “And Salome Danced,” and read much of the conversations about what whether Mars was male or female. I noted that most of the conversational focus was on Mars, and less was on the gender ambiguity that Jo(e) presents.

In your last paragraph in “The Erotics of Gender Ambiguity”, you write:

I guess [this story] might be construed to be warning us against absolute refusal of a stable gender identity. I say ‘˜guess’™, because I’™m speculating, and can’™t be sure I haven’™t made a mistaken inference somewhere along the line. It’™s tricky, thinking about these things. But the important thing, is that we do think about them, we do inquire about them, without ceasing.

…and I thought, wow. I really must be in a different place. If that’s true, I wonder how I got here.

The background is that I was raised to be a girl, but the tomboy in me refused to be quiet. In fact, I could never imagine myself either male or female. I was just me, with a girl’s body parts, but without any sense of how or where I fit into the gender continuum. I have failed my whole life to present any particular way.

During my college years, I decided to look into gender reassignment, but never followed through on it, because I would feel no more male than I feel female. I have friends who are biologically female, but whose name and (sometimes) gender expression is decidedly male.

You bet it confuses people. But perhaps a warning “against absolute refusal of a stable gender identity” is less…needed? Many people consider my friends and acquaintances sexually appealing, and their continual gender morphing non-threatening.

My partner is a minister, and she often complains that the point she tried to get across in her UU (Unitarian-Universalist) sermons was completely missed. I fear that I may have done just that with your wonderful story, but I thought I might ask you your thoughts about my experiences/interpretations.

Thanks for your amazing writing!

Janine


Hi Janine,

And thank you for taking the time to read it and think/feel about it. I appreciate it.

But I do think you have misread. “The Erotics of Gender Ambiguity” is not my essay, it’s an online discussion by feminist critics, writers and academics of “Salome.” I didn’t participate in it at all. The quote you’ve referenced was by Timmi Duchamp, the editor of Aqueduct Press and the author of a formidable oeuvre of feminist fiction and criticism.

Looking at the formatting of the title of the piece, I can see how it might appear that I was claiming authorship of the discussion rather than the story itself. I’ve made some changes to clarify that.

Timmi has a lot of cool ideas about gender and other issues. But I don’t agree with all of them, including this speculation about “Salome.” I don’t at all see the story as arguing against refusal of stable gender identity. That’s not what I intended when I wrote it, for sure. Not that such a reading is necessarily “wrong” — simply that is not my reading, and was not part of my writing. But we all bring different concerns and interests and experiences to our reading of fiction, and those things filter our response to it… and so the responses of the online panel are fascinating to me, all these different perspectives brought to bear on the work. Very flattering, honestly, to have so many people talk about something I wrote. I love that ability of fiction to engender (hah! I made a pun!) this kind of engaged conversation.

But my conversation would be — has been — different. The essay “Identity and Desire” is my response to the online discussion, and that’s where you’ll find my then-ideas about gender. My most recent (published) thoughts are in this interview at the Aqueduct blog. I think you’ll find my notions are a lot more in line with yours (grin). I’d love to hear more about what you think.

I never felt like much of a “girl” growing up. As you’ve said, I was just me. I have been through phases of not really expressing gender in any active way; I’ve made deliberate choices to transgress against the gender norms of my time/culture; and I’ve made deliberate choices to express myself in “normed” ways as a source of power and play. Mostly, I’m a mix. Nicola calls me a “gender warrior,” which I find amusing and cool, but really I’m not fighting. I am having fun. And I am, in fact, refusing a stable gender identity. I make my choices, and then when I feel like it, I change them. I no longer feel any need to justify them to anyone except myself — not to the cultural-normative-standards police, the feminist community, the women-over-forty-should-or-shouldn’t brigade… they can all go talk to someone else about their choices. I’ll be over here dancing.

When truth is braver than fiction

In my life, and my work, gender is many things — a gauntlet, a playground, a stage, a sex toy, a vulnerability, a power, an expectation, and a wide open space. I’ve done things that women aren’t “supposed” to do, and been told I’m either more or less of a woman for doing them. I have at various times either (or both) accepted and resisted gender expectations. I’ve done my share of boundary pushing.

But I’ve never had to be this brave.

There are billions of ways to be human. Here’s one. Good for these people. I hope they raise a beautiful little girl.

Can the lady write like a man?

*Snork!*

Gakked from Cheryl, who very sensibly points out that if Drs. Riccobono and Pedriali really think this is such a new topic, they should sit down with a cup of coffee and a few Tiptree stories. (Mom, can I be ineluctably masculine when I grow up? Of course, dear, now put your pith helmet on and go outside…).

You can learn more about the fascinating Tiptree from the fascinating biography by Julie Phillips.

Interview: Speculating Gender

I recently sat down with Jesse Vernon of Aqueduct Press for beer and conversation about Dangerous Space, Mars, and gender in life and fiction. I enjoyed it: I hope you will too.

Read the interview on the Aqueduct Press blog, and wander back this way if you’d like to talk more about it.