Nicola on Huffington Post
4 April 2008
Go read Nicola on The Huffington Post. Her post is called “Taser Buzz Kill.” I expect we’ll be getting angry phone calls from taser manufacturers any second now…
But seriously, who knew there were pink tasers specially for us gals, to make us feel more feminine (if no better defended) at those difficult times?
*Sigh*
It’s a great post, go read it!
Posted by Kelley | Filed Under blog
Comments
4 Responses to “Nicola on Huffington Post”
Follow me on Twitter
I won't sell you or spam you.
Interested in what people have to say?
Get all new comments by email.
Recent talk
- Well, now
- Heart’s a mess
- January dream
- Stop SOPA and PIPA
- Peace out, G-Scout
- The wonder
- Clarion West, all year long!
- The MS paper that can change it all
- Multiple sclerosis is a metabolic disorder, not an immune system illness
- Coming soon: important news about MS
Other things
- The Omni Internet round robin story
- The Talent of the Room
by Michael Ventura, used by permission - From the Beginning
my advice to beginning writers - Read stories -- "And Salome Danced" and "Strings", both from Dangerous Space.
Watch this
Mad Rush, the vid for "Strings." See the vid full size here or at YouTube.I read
- @U2
- Ask Nicola
- Cinematical
- Deadline Hollywood Daily
- distal muse
- Evil Genius Chronicles
- Gemæcca
- johnaugust.com
- PostSecret
- Shaken & Stirred
- The Leftsetz Letter
- The Swivet
- Women & Hollywood
I listen to
- Radio Paradise

- KCRW
- my Pandora stations are:
clubbing with noir
radio noir
I like
- The art of April Gornik
- Bunnies Theatre
- Knowing how stuff works
Categories
- audio (4)
- being human (42)
- cw (41)
- events (3)
- friday pint (131)
- gender (9)
- hollywood (5)
- interviews (9)
- jukebox (11)
- keyword search (7)
- life (195)
- movies (46)
- music (70)
- news (36)
- quotes (20)
- reading (25)
- reviews (7)
- screenwriting (24)
- talk to me (122)
- television (4)
- writing (232)
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- September 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- June 2002
© 2007 kelleyeskridge.com · Revolution theme by Brian Gardner




Hey, some of us guys might want a pink taser too!
Wow that’s something else. I read it on her blog…which I found by reading THE SWIVET.
Welcome to the dance around the legal system.
I wonder sometimes if this is an American thing, this fascination with the gadget doing the job for you.
For several years I worked retail in a photo shop, and I came to recognize a particular type of wannabe photographer. This was the person who spent a great deal of money on the Next Neat Gadget, as if the new lens, the new light meter, the new film, whatever, would magically make him or her the photographer they wanted to be. When I told them that what they really needed to do was to go shoot a lot of film, print a lot of pictures, and pay attention to how they saw things—you know, practice?—-and that the tools wouldn’t do the job for them, they would more often than not get profoundly depressed. I think deep down they either knew or thought they had no natural talent. But they had money, and there were gadgets they could buy that would do this and that and maybe they didn’t need talent…
As a kid, I was thoroughly picked on by bullies. I asked my dad—who had taught hand-to-hand combat in the army—to teach me to fight. The first thing he did was to try to show me how to fall. I didn’t want that. I was trying to avoid that, frankly, and this made no sense to me. But, he said, if you don’t know how to fall, you can’t learn the rest. Furthermore, in a fight, you have to recognize that you’re going to get hurt. Because my desire was to learn a gimmick that would prevent me from getting hurt, I put off learning from him for a few more years. I wanted the magic gimmick. With that, I wouldn’t be at risk.
Wrong.
I grew up with guns. I learned early how to use them. I do not own one now. Why? Because I don’t have the time to become proficient and I feel it’s useless to own one unless you’re willing and able to learn how to use it.
Tasers, as Nicola observes, are psychological safety blankets. And about as effective if the owner is unwilling to learn how to use it. Which means…well, she nailed it.
Don’t even get me started on people who don’t want to do the work.
I understand not wanting to do it, whatever “it” is — learning to use a taser, learning to take photographs, learning to write. Starting out, screwing up, sucking it up and going back again (and again, and again) is hard. But I am no longer patient with people who actually let that stop them.
I am sure that part of my impatience comes from the fact that I let it stop me for many years.
It’s part of growing up, I guess, at least it has been for me. And on some level, I just want to hang with grownups these days, you know?
So no pink taser for me.