New review and interview
2 May 2008
The Short Review reviews Dangerous Space.
They’ve also posted an interview which, as my editor at Aqueduct has pointed out, does not mention the word “gender” a single time. I get the impression she thinks this is a miracle for me. But in fact it’s not all about gender, really. Sometimes it’s about sex other things.
Enjoy.
Posted by Kelley | Filed Under blog, interviews, news, reviews, writing
Comments
4 Responses to “New review and interview”
Follow me on Twitter
I won't sell you or spam you.
Interested in what people have to say?
Get all new comments by email.
Recent talk
- Well, now
- Heart’s a mess
- January dream
- Stop SOPA and PIPA
- Peace out, G-Scout
- The wonder
- Clarion West, all year long!
- The MS paper that can change it all
- Multiple sclerosis is a metabolic disorder, not an immune system illness
- Coming soon: important news about MS
Other things
- The Omni Internet round robin story
- The Talent of the Room
by Michael Ventura, used by permission - From the Beginning
my advice to beginning writers - Read stories -- "And Salome Danced" and "Strings", both from Dangerous Space.
Watch this
Mad Rush, the vid for "Strings." See the vid full size here or at YouTube.I read
- @U2
- Ask Nicola
- Cinematical
- Deadline Hollywood Daily
- distal muse
- Evil Genius Chronicles
- Gemæcca
- johnaugust.com
- PostSecret
- Shaken & Stirred
- The Leftsetz Letter
- The Swivet
- Women & Hollywood
I listen to
- Radio Paradise

- KCRW
- my Pandora stations are:
clubbing with noir
radio noir
I like
- The art of April Gornik
- Bunnies Theatre
- Knowing how stuff works
Categories
- audio (4)
- being human (42)
- cw (41)
- events (3)
- friday pint (131)
- gender (9)
- hollywood (5)
- interviews (9)
- jukebox (11)
- keyword search (7)
- life (195)
- movies (46)
- music (70)
- news (36)
- quotes (20)
- reading (25)
- reviews (7)
- screenwriting (24)
- talk to me (122)
- television (4)
- writing (232)
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- August 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- December 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- September 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- June 2002
© 2007 kelleyeskridge.com · Revolution theme by Brian Gardner




Hi, random internet stranger here (who loves your work by the way),
Scooting straight down to see what the review has to say about “Eye of the Storm” (which is a Stendhal syndrome story for me and I don’t care who knows it
, I thought it was interesting that Tania read Mars as ‘a young boy’ in that story, even though she spotted that Mars was written as ungendered in her/his other two stories… yet nonetheless felt that on balance s/he was female in “And Salome Danced”.
Based on my incredibly scientific research sample (i.e. a tiny handful of reviews of previous anthologies featuring those stories I’ve read at random times over the last few years), I can’t help feel that readers who don’t notice that Mars is ungendered have a tendency to see her/him as female in “Salome” and as male in “Storm”. I wonder why? (Not sure about “Dangerous Space”.)
I suppose the effect might be muted now that all three stories are published in the same volume… bit hard not to notice the neutral gendering three times in a row, surely?…
Anyway, congrats on the great reviews, and looking forward to reading the whole book as soon as it reaches Aussie shores (or I succumb to the great tempter that is Amazon…)
Hi Matt,
I had to go look up Stendhal syndrome, so a) I learned something and b) wow, that’s one of the coolest compliments I’ve ever had on a story, thank you very much indeed.
I think a lot about the Mars issue as well in regards to those two stories. I think that with “Salome” it’s because there is a specific instance where Lucky responds to Joe, and Mars doesn’t, and has the private thought surprise, little actor. Which could lead the reader to believe that Joe “ought” to be surprised because Mars is also a woman. It’s basically easier as a reader to assume that both are women, rather than assume that Joe assumes he can turn anyone on….
In “Storm,” well, it could be the fact that the quad is two women and a man when Mars meets them, and so folks assume the symmetry. I wrestled with that one for a while, but in the end I just thought that if there were two men in the quad, everyone would think Mars was a young woman by default, and since so many people thought Mars was a woman in “Salome,” it seemed that if I must leave a default impression, I should do so in the opposite direction.
And of course I can’t control what default assumptions readers bring to the table, that’s a fool’s game. So mostly with Mars I simply strive for some kind of internal balance in the stories. And I try hard not to give the impression of gyrating wildly in order to “hide” Mars’ gender. I work for that appearance of ease, for the story to simply unfold in such a way that gender references are unnecessary. It’s interesting that it’s not that hard, mostly.
As for “Dangerous Space,” well… I think it’s the best Mars story yet, although I have a huge love for “Storm” and am delighted when anyone else loves it… I love Mars’ huge yearning and stubbornness and questing spirit. And you’ll find all that in DS — and it seems to be a story that really works for readers in terms of just taking them there. I hope that if you get to read it, you’ll let me know what you think.
I had to look up that syndrome too. Excellent.
I did think that Joe assumes he can turn anyone on. And it seemed kinda true.
My thought about it has been that people assume a gender for Mars according to what part of the character they can identify (or not) with, and also according to stereotypical gender roles most of us pick up from society. Storm was the only story where I personally did not naturally assume which gender Mars was. I went back and forth. I think because of the fighting a lot of people would lean toward male (even tho the other two women do fight).
I think in all cases I tended to assume Mars was a woman because I am, and I could identify with some parts of Mars.
I think that’s great. I’m fine with whatever choice people make about Mars’ gender — my goal is for as many readers as possible to be able to access the character in whatever way they choose. The comfortable way, the not-so-comfortable way… some readers want a story to be a stretch, a challenge, and some want a story to be like a wave that falls over them and rolls them onto some fascinating shore. I hope Mars can be those things to people.