Horror stories

I have been a Stephen King fan since I was a teenager. I think, at his best, he is one of the all-time masters of story and character. He understands how the smallest moment or seemingly unimportant choice can utterly change a life. He can tell a hell of a story. And no one does a particular kind of American voice better. Stephen King books can scare the shit out of me every time, to the point that I get spooked reading them by myself at night.

Other horror books I love: Ghost Story and Shadowland by Peter Straub, The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson, Stoker’s Dracula, most all of Poe

And every once in a while I’ll watch a horror movie. I like Alien, Aliens, Jaws, The Haunting (the 1963 Robert Wise film, not the cringe-inducing Jan de Bont 1999 remake).

All in all, a very short list from a very large field. I stopped appreciating horror when the splatterpunks came along in the 80’s. I’ve read the Books of Blood and the rest of the splattercanon, and you know what? Just don’t like it.

Today I watched 30 Days of Night. Well, I watched about 70% and fast-forwarded through the rest. It wasn’t offensive. It was a smart premise. And the violence was as much suggested as shown — it certainly earns the R rating, but it’s not the linger-lovingly-on-the-violence-in-slow-motion approach that made me turn off Robocop (and please, can someone please help Verhoeven with his issues? It’s getting so I won’t watch a movie with his name on it…).

But in other ways it was too routine to elevate it above the formulaic. A bunch of demographically-varied people get picked off one by one, some because they are stupid and some because they are noble. The nice touch was the ending….

SPOILER ALERT
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

… in which the hero realizes that he has to become a monster in order to be able to fight them (they are really strong), so he injects himself with the tainted blood of a victim in order to induce a transformation. He saves his ex-girlfriend and the obligatory orphaned child (yep, same old instant-family routine), and then dies in her arms as the sun finally comes up. No last-minute reprieve.

I wouldn’t watch this movie again, but because it bored me, not because it offended me. And I can certainly be offended. I won’t ever watch the Saw movies or Hostel or Funny Games any of the other torture-porn/let’s-get-sadistic-on-someone’s-ass films that seem to be the new splatterpunk.

If it’s true that horror films help us cathartize (is that a word?) deep cultural fears, allow us to bleed energy out of some personal demons, then maybe it makes some kind of sense that so many of these movies are about random, sadistic violence. The kind of thing any of us are helpless to prevent or to control, that we can only try to survive. Maybe that’s how we’re all feeling about our world and our lives right now. There’s a line I heard that to me is a perfect example, from the new movie The Strangers, in which the heroine asks one of the random masked-into-facelessness strangers, “Why are you doing this to us?” and the stranger says, “Because you were home.” It doesn’t get any more pointed than that.

But I fucking hate those movies. In the worst moments (mine or theirs), I leave them feeling both compartmentalized and complicit in something nasty. I feel flattened. Reduced. I hate the whole story ethic that trivializes human violence by making it “just because” and then making that the center of a story. To me, that’s a rotton core. To me, it’s the same nihilism as the root of splatterpunk — let’s just think of worse and worse things to describe, to witness, to be on some level engaged with, and the first one to blink and turn away is a wuss.

That particular kind of human violence is too frightening and too real to treat that way. I don’t want to see it turned into entertainment, any more than I want to see rape turned into entertainment. But clearly a lot of people do want to see it. And I’m curious why. Anyone who has theories to share (actual theories as opposed to judgment of the audience), I’d really like to hear them. As a storyteller, it’s something I’d like to understand even if I don’t ever want to do it.

I am interested in writing a horror novel someday — but it’ll be more King than Saw. I’d like to explore the kind of scare that seems to be out of vogue right now (typical Eskridge timing) — the fear of the unknown and unknowable, the unexplained, the monsters that scare us because they come from deep within us, or because we are tempted to let them that far in. I hope there will still be a place for that when I get around to it.

What horror films or books have you liked? Can you tell me why? I’m interested in refining my own notions about these things.

3 thoughts on “Horror stories”

  1. I agree with you about King. And I think that he hasn’t forgotten what it’s like to be a child, knowing just how scary and confusing the adult world can be.

    I am also a fan of The Haunting of Hill House, both the book and the 1963 movie. The all time scariest movie line for me is, “My god, whose hand was I holding!” The haunting was all by implication, but it was still scarier than hell.

    As to the rapine and mayhem movies, I think people like them because just like in real life, we can find the victims different than us. They are dumb; they are careless; they are in the wrong place at the wrong time. I am of the generation who still takes a shower with my eyes open because I saw Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, and it was in black and white. If you do decide to write a horror story, I like the uncanny far more than the gory.

    Barbara Sanchez

  2. Movies by Val Lewton may be the two best ever. While The Leopard Man was wonderful, I want to mention just one scene in Cat People. Jane Randolph is walking down the sidewalk at night. “Click, click, click,” go her heels. The camera pans along the top of the wall that borders the sidewalk. Branches move. Randolph senses something is following her and walks faster. “Click, click, click, click.” The camera follows the top of the wall. “Click, click, click, click, click, click…” Randolph begins to look behind her. Then…Well, the suspense was all dependent on mood and what was in themind. There were no gruesome monsters ripping out spines with blood squirting everywhere. The horror was all implied and it scared the hell out of me. I believe subtlety almost always tops overt horror. Give me Val Lewton every time.

  3. @ Barbara — yes, I think you’re right about King remembering the child’s perspective, the need to go with what happens whether one understands it or not. That’s interesting in terms of creating character… I’ll have to think about it some more.

    And yes, that’s my favorite scene from Hill House too. So spooky! The knocking, and the terrified whispered one-sided conversation, and the hand….. yikes.

    @ Pierce — How could I have forgotten Cat People? You’re absolutely right — the walking scene, and later the swimming pool scene, both totally scary. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.